Can applicants use AI to complete ability tests?
By Getfeedback on Mar 28, 2024


At GFB we work closely with many organisations to help support them in how they select high potential candidates, that would make successful and valuable employees. Some of the more recent trends that our clients have observed is the use of AI and ChatGPT in completing application forms, the text created by AI on standard application forms appears very similar and can be fairly easy to identify. So it would seem, that in today’s world originality is to be valued; being less than perfect may become a way of standing out from the AI-using and reliant crowd, that are applying for roles in prestigious companies and organisations this year.
How we can help
Many of our clients ask us for advice and support in using ability tests to help them to select the highest calibre candidates, in particular those organisations where the ability to think critically at pace is an important aspect of the role. One example of this is the law firm sector when selecting graduates. We help our clients by recommending the most relevant ability tests and the most useful norm group, along with helping to interpret the results and to give advice on recommended selection levels. Some of our clients this year are asking for reassurance that the results that they are seeing are not using AI or Chat bots to attain better scores in the tests.
Is Ability still relevant. Why not use AI?
A person’s cognitive ability and how able they are to think in a critical way is even more important today than 20 years ago. Our education system today rewards good results to those who are successful at taking exams and these candidates are seen to have high levels of intelligence. However, it is well proven that success in the workplace and future potential can be identified through ability testing to establish how able a candidate is to think critically. The marked difference between intelligence and critical thinking is the mental facility to develop analytical reasoning skills to evaluate alternative viewpoints and persuasively argued opinions. To remain objective and establish what is fact and what is assumed is vital in today’s world of fake news and social media.
So can we use AI to do this for us? Is it important that our candidates can think critically without the use of AI. The answer is a very definite yes.
Can candidates use AI to complete ability tests?
In a previous blog we shared what measures we have taken to establish how “cheat proof” our ability tests are. For the full article and detail have a look here https://www.gfbgroup.com/post/can-chatbots-really-pass-the-watson-glaser
So in short thne ability tests we offer are cheat proof for the following reasons:
- Item banking – Watson Glaser is and item banked test and is the gold standard test preferred by many organisations for selecting graduates. No one test is the same and this reduces cheating.
- Time limits - Cut and pasting and using AI/Chatbots to take the tests does not improve performance, cut and pasting questions takes too long and the Chatbots don’t perform as well as real life candidates. Recent updates to tests prevent cut and pasting.
- Tracking response patterns – we can see if there is frequent tab switching so flagging possible cheating.
- Using high standard norm groups – comparing ability test results to high performance norm groups allows the best candidates to stand out and chat bots do not perform at this level.
Our clients are reassured by the measures that we have taken and the advice that we share with them to help them in selecting the graduates and candidates that they know will make successful employees. We are a trusted partner.
If you would like to know more about how we can help you to use Ability testing to help you to identify and select the very best candidates please get in touch.
- Case studies (14)
- Recruitment (14)
- Leadership Development (12)
- 360 Degree Feedback (6)
- 360 feedback (5)
- development (5)
- Assesment (4)
- AI Recruitment (3)
- leadership (3)
- people data (3)
- Ability (2)
- Assessment (2)
- Consultancy (2)
- Diversity & Inclusion (2)
- Emotional Intelligence (2)
- Employee Engagement (2)
- Ethical Hiring (2)
- Neurodiversity (2)
- WatsonGlaser (2)
- feedback (2)
- strength based leadership (2)
- Assess (1)
- CIPD 2024 Annual Conference (1)
- Diversity (1)
- Leadership AI (1)
- Learning (1)
- Learningagility (1)
- Motivation (1)
- Test (1)
- Values (1)
- Watson Glaser (1)
- July 2026 (3)
- June 2026 (2)
- May 2026 (6)
- April 2026 (2)
- March 2026 (1)
- February 2026 (1)
- January 2026 (1)
- November 2025 (2)
- October 2025 (2)
- September 2025 (2)
- August 2025 (1)
- July 2025 (2)
- June 2025 (1)
- April 2025 (1)
- January 2025 (1)
- December 2024 (2)
- November 2024 (2)
- October 2024 (5)
- September 2024 (3)
- August 2024 (3)
- July 2024 (3)
- June 2024 (2)
- May 2024 (4)
- April 2024 (1)
- March 2024 (4)
- February 2024 (4)
- January 2024 (1)
- December 2023 (3)
- November 2023 (5)
- October 2023 (2)
- September 2023 (2)
- August 2023 (2)
- July 2023 (2)
- June 2023 (3)
- May 2023 (2)
- April 2023 (2)
- March 2023 (4)
- February 2023 (3)
- January 2023 (1)
- December 2022 (1)
- November 2022 (2)
- October 2022 (2)
- June 2021 (1)
- January 2021 (1)
- October 2020 (1)
- August 2020 (1)
- August 2019 (1)
Subscribe by email
You May Also Like
These Related Stories

'Tough luck, suck it up'

Precision development - Part One


No Comments Yet
Let us know what you think